Here is the transcript of my talk Global Catastrophic Risks: An Overview
Some other talks from the meeting are emerging on Accelerating future, including JoSHs scary talk on weather control - while this particular application may not be the most dangerous, I think he is spot on about the risky dynamics of dual-use, global technologies with enormous first mover advantages.
My personal list of indicators that something could be *really* dangerous is:
Conversely, risks that have size cut-offs (fires, earthquakes), are not self-amplifying or can be studied are if not safer at least manageable. If we can find tools to introduce cut-offs, stop self-amplification or bound unknowability we can reduce threats quite a lot.