Many of the most awesome formulas you meet when getting into mathematics are continued fractions like

and nested radicals like

.

What about nested/continued integrals? Here is a simple one:

.

The way to see this is to recognize that the x in the first integral is going to integrate to , the x in the second will be integrated twice , and so on.

In general additive integrals of this kind turn into sums (assuming convergence, handwave, handwave…):

.

On the other hand, .

So if we insert we get the sum . For we end up with . The differential equation has solution . Setting the integral is clearly zero, so . Tying it together we get:

.

Things are trickier when the integrals are multiplicative, like . However, we can turn it into a differential equation: which has the well known solution . Same thing for , giving us . Since we are running indefinite integrals we get those pesky constants.

Plugging in gives . If we set we get the mildly amusing and in retrospect obvious formula

.

We can of course mess things up further, like , where the differential equation becomes with the solution . A surprisingly simple solution to a weird-looking integral. In a similar vein:

And if you want a real mind-bender, use the Lambert W function:

, then .

(that is, you get an implicit but well defined expression for the (x,I(x)) values. With Lambert, the x and y axes always tend to switch place).

[And yes, convergence is handwavy in this essay. I think the best way of approaching it is to view the values of these integrals as the functions invariant under the functional consisting of the integral and its repeated function: whether nearby functions are attracted to it (or not) under repeated application of the functional depends on the case. ]